Cases 41 - 50 of 367
WOODS v. IMPD
as 1:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PLYANDER WOODS
Defendant:
IMPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. TURNER et al
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
TIFFANIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAY TURNER, JOHNNY ANGEL, ANDREW STORIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS et al v. DELAWARE COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
TIFFANIE WILLIAMS and LANZELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY INDIANA, DELAWARE COUNTY SHERRIFFS OFFICE, TOWN OF EATON INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KELLY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, KAY WILKS, M.D., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. ROSSER et al
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Defendant:
BRADLEY ROSSER, ROBBIE FEE, WILLIAM AMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUFF et al v. MONROE COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. HUFF, II and NICOLE E. HUFF
Defendant:
MONROE COUNTY, MONROE COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION and MONROE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
