Cases 41 - 50 of 82
YOUNG v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2017cv02818
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Plaintiff:
MAURICE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
BROWNING v. CITY OF MT. VERNON et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWNING
Defendant:
CITY OF MT. VERNON, COUNTY OF POSEY COUNTY, MT. VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
YOUNG et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv03395
Defendant:
LAURA B CONWAY, CRAIG HUFF, MAIN STREET RENEWAL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
K.W., RACQUEL YOUNG and SHEMECA YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERZ v. GOODMAN et al
as 1:2016cv02868
Defendant:
CYNTHIA AYERS, GERALD BEPKO, SUSAN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HERZ v. PESCOVITZ et al
as 1:2016cv01360
Defendant:
U.S. SEN. EVAN BAYH, SUSAN BROOKS, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
YOUNG v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2016cv01238
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Plaintiff:
MAURICE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2015cv01472
Defendant:
MARCUS BROWN, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERZ v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, GERALD BEPKO, SUSAN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
