Cases 51 - 60 of 63
DOE v. MARVEL et al
as 2:2010cv00344
Defendant:
JEREMY DAVIS, BRIAN DAWSON, GREG EWING and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLYNN v. ROBERT GARNER et al
as 1:2010cv01569
Defendant:
JAILER MS. BRAY, JAILER DIANA DOE, JAILER JEREMY LONG and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH JAMES FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CIESIELSKI et al
as 1:2010cv01453
Defendant:
PAUL R. CIESIELSKI, JEREMY B. DEVENNING, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DOE v. MARVEL et al
as 1:2010cv01316
Defendant:
JEREMY DAVIS, BRIAN DAWSON, KIM HAWKINS and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
BALES et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2009cv01166
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BALES, HAROLD BALES and COLLEEN BALES
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF, BRANDON GARRIGUS, JAMES DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIDWEST MINERALS, INC. v. WILSON et al
as 2:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
MIDWEST MINERALS, INC.
Defendant:
FRED L. WILSON, RICK JENKINS, JOSEPH KENWORTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
RITZ v. FRITZ et al
as 1:2009cv00889
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. RITZ
Defendant:
MARK FRITZ, JEREMY S. KUNTZ and FRANKLIN COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
