Cases 81 - 90 of 11,067
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHAW v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SHAW
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR and MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. BINFORD
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW BINFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON et al v. AULT et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
TERRY JOHNSON and AUTUMN BREEZE JOHNSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW AULT, SHAWNA AULT, CITY OF VINCENNES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
