Cases 1 - 10 of 13
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. KIRK et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
LUCRETIA M. JOYCE
Defendant:
SUSAN KIRK, DOTTIE THOMAS, CANDICE LAST NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EDGE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant:
JAMES BELL, MIKE HART, RYAN MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON L. EDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. MADISON CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 1:2019cv04834
Defendant:
MADISON CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT., COURTENEY LEANNE STATON, DANIEL J. KOPP and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DEBOARD v. LAKESIDE APARTMENTS OF CARMEL, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04610
Defendant:
ATAPCO PROPERTIES, INC., JC HART COMPANY, INC. and LAKESIDE APARTMENTS OF CARMEL, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
HOLLOWAY v. GRAY et al
as 1:2011cv01267
Defendant:
STEVE CROOKE, ANTHONY GATTO, RONALD GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CURTRINA HOLLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
