Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
MCKINNEY v. HOLT et al
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff: SUZANNE McKINNEY
Defendant: KAYLA A. HOLT, RN, TERRY HOLT, JASON SAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. WELLS et al
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant: Officer LOGAN SHOEMAKER, Chief of Police COBIE J WELLS, LOGAN SHOEMAKER and others
Plaintiff: RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00088
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00129
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RAY v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY
as 1:2018cv03463
Plaintiff: LOGAN CHARLES RAY
Defendant: INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAY v. CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03462
Plaintiff: LOGAN CHARLES RAY
Defendant: CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OWSLEY v. GORBETT et al
as 1:2015cv00552
Plaintiff: LOGAN A. OWSLEY
Defendant: MARK E. GORBETT, ERNEST DEWAYNE JANES, SR., DEAN A. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BECKETT v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 1:2014cv01937
Plaintiff: JAMES BECKETT
Defendant: CARMEL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, PATRICK CLENNON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LOGAN et al v. WILKINS, M.D. et al
as 1:2009cv00805
Plaintiff: JOHN A. LOGAN and JOHN A. LOGAN
Defendant: DONNA WILKINS, M.D., DONNA WILKINS, M.D., RODNEY BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?