Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOWMAN v. STANLEY et al
as 1:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
KAI A BOWMAN
Defendant:
SETH STANLEY, JOSEPH SHAFER, TAYLOR BAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAFFETT v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
WILLIE G. MAFFETT
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT., SETH GORMAN, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
WANG et al v. CITY OF FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv04042
Defendant:
SETH JOHNSON, DAVID BOHMEIER, JOHN DOE 7 and others
Plaintiff:
CHUEN HUA WANG, GUARDIAN CHUEN HUA WANG and TIAN HUEI WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv00001
Defendant:
CITY OF SEYMOUR, TROY VANOVER, SETH SAGE and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LAND v. WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
SETH LAND
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
