Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TAYLOR v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv00375
Defendant:
RYAN DIENHART, KEITH CUTLIFF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
VETRIA R. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINTERS v. DOMBKOWSKI et al
as 1:2019cv04915
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL A. WINTERS
Defendant:
DOMBKOWSKI, HIMES, LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNHOUSE v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2019cv00958
Defendant:
DONALD BAILEY, STEVE STEWART, FONDA KING and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BARNHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASH et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv02849
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, STATE OF INDIANA, PETER STEPHEN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH NASH and TAMMY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WINTERS, JR. v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2013cv02028
Defendant:
RYAN ARCHER, CHAD MELLOH, JOSHUA MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
OTTIS WINTERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SKELTON et al v. WINTER
as 3:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SKELTON, JEAN WILSON and DELORES JONES
Defendant:
DAN WINTER
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CRAIG v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
ROBIN R. CRAIG
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
