Cases 1 - 10 of 11,090
RROS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
RROS and BROOKIE R. MORRISON
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLLINS v. ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS
as 1:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
ERNEST COLLINS
Defendant:
ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
BLANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
RODIA BLANTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. CLODGO et al
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA R. COLEMAN
Defendant:
BRENT CLODGO, I.P.S., FAMILY HOPE and others
YATES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
JAMES YATES
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE BLOOMINGTON CARE CENTER, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, INC. and GGNSC BLOOMINGTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCCAULEY v. NEWREZ LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
DEREK STEVEN MCCAULEY
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, SHANNON O'CONNELL EGAN, CATHY DONDZILA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
