Cases 11 - 20 of 173
GRONVALL v. LOCKETT
as 2:2015cv00140
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS and CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
KALMAR GENE GRONVALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. DR. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNN BROWN, Jr.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, J. F. CARAWAY, DR. MICKEY CHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FOWLER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2014cv00297
Defendant:
CRAIG COIL, J. CHARLES LOCKETT and THOMAS WEBSTER
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT, et al.
as 2:2014cv00068
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NORTH v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2013cv00427
Defendant:
BIXLER, BRACE, TRACY HEISER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SPROUSE v. LOCKETT
as 2:2013cv00391
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DONNY LYNN SPROUSE, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
