Cases 11 - 20 of 19,243
MCCARTHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Defendant:
A. SMITH and GEO/N.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZEHNER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
JOEL ZEHNER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RESSLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RESSLER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
LARRY LINTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER, ARAMARK, INC., ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00942
Petitioner:
GEORGE ANDRE SMALL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
GREENWELL v. BEATTY et al
as 1:2024cv00947
Petitioner:
REGINALD A. GREENWELL, JR.
Respondent:
J. BEATTY and AWOLUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
GREENWELL v. BEATTY et al
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. GREENWELL, JR.
Defendant:
BEATTY and AWOLUSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERKINS v. LANE
as 1:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
