Cases 21 - 30 of 44
POINDEXTER v. FREEMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00109
Defendant:
JAMES FREEMAN and SCOTT FISCHER
Plaintiff:
JWAUN L. POINDEXTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. COOPER AND FREEMAN LAW FIRM et al
as 4:2018cv00196
Defendant:
COOPER AND FREEMAN LAW FIRM, INDIANA STATE POLICE and ASHLEY URBAN LAW FIRM
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. STATE OF INDIANA POLICE et al
as 4:2018cv00140
Defendant:
COOPER AND FREEMAN, ASHLEY ARBIN, STATE OF INDIANA POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLEN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv02254
Defendant:
KRUL, A. PETTY, J. DENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. FREEMAN
as 4:2018cv00076
Defendant:
LOGAN FORDICE, BRAD FREEMAN and CHARLES S. MURPHY
Plaintiff:
WAYMON D. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FOSTER et al
as 4:2018cv00032
Defendant:
JOEY BARRIS, JAUSH CLARK, DERICK FOSTER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYMAN D. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH EL v. RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS INC et al
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
VINCE FREEMAN, CHRISTOPHER MUHNEY and RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv00532
Defendant:
DAVID BARR, IDOC, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00393
Petitioner:
JAMES FREEMAN
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FREEMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv01970
Petitioner:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
