Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 73
LANE v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00219
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: MICHAEL LANE
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CABLE v. PATERNITY COURT et al
as 1:2017cv03722
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant: JOHN COX, MICHELLE LANE COX, LORI DURBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00334
Petitioner: JASON C. LANE
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. MURRIE
as 3:2016cv00045
Plaintiff: MARK ALAN LANE
Defendant: DAN MURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARK ALAN LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00001
Petitioner: MARK ALAN LANE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00007
Petitioner: MICHAEL V. LANE
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. SPAINHOUR
as 1:2013cv01980
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant: MARVIN SPAINHOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE v. USA
as 3:2013cv00184
Petitioner: MARK A. LANE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. DOGGENDORF
as 1:2013cv01431
Defendant: DOGGENDORF
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. CABEZAS
as 1:2013cv01430
Defendant: MARTA M. CABEZAS
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?