Cases 31 - 40 of 60
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANKLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv00022
Petitioner:
DERRICK FRANKLIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01522
Defendant:
OFFICER D. CONLEY, WENDY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. MABEY
as 1:2015cv00958
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BAKER
Defendant:
A. MABEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BAKER
Defendant:
MICHEAL BARNES, WENDY KNIGHT, MIKE RAINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00363
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00216
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2014cv01522
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BAKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, MARINETTE BOYD, CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIMMS et al v. LILARIVE
as 2:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
FRANK EDWARD and DERRICK MIMMS
Defendant:
LILARIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BAKER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BAKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, MARINETTE BOYD, CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
