Cases 41 - 50 of 53
MALONE v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00790
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE MALONE
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, JAMES COOTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DONAHUE
as 3:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
LOWELL COOPER
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBB v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00674
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, STEVE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. BUSS et al
as 2:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Defendant:
EDDIE BUSS, J. DAVID DONAHUE, GILBERT PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUTTRULL v. DONAHUE et al
as 3:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LUTTRULL
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE and A. FINNAN
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
LEWIS v. DOC COMMISSIONER DAVID DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00458
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS
Defendant:
DOC COMMISSIONER DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, DR. WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMLET v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv00440
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, PHIL SLAVENS, T. RIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R. MCMILLAN
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DONAHUE
as 2:2007cv00034
Petitioner:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. DONAHUE
as 1:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BENEVOLENCE AARON BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
