Cases 41 - 50 of 699
COBB v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROLLING v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01156
Petitioner:
BRYSON ROLLING
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWEAT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00291
Petitioner:
KEVIN W. SWEAT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCMURRAY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
JEROME ROBERT MCMURRAY, III
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS JR v. THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER THOMAS JR
Defendant:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
