Cases 41 - 50 of 85
WALTERS v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00415
Defendant:
TONI JORDAN, RACHAEL HOUGHTON, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. PRESTEL
as 1:2018cv03548
Plaintiff:
TONY LIONEL LOVE
Defendant:
MATHEW PRESTEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLYNN v. RAINS et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Defendant:
HARLEY CRABB, BRETT DIERDORF, TONY KEITH and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMERY v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00142
Petitioner:
TONY E. EMERY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HENLEY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv00736
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, WENDY KNIGHT, THE SACRED SPIRITUAL ADVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
TONY HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04643
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
TONY ALLEN TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALTERS v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 1:2017cv04108
Defendant:
AQWAY, KIMBERLY BALLARD, CHASSITY and others
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMBS v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2017cv03359
Defendant:
PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE INC
Plaintiff:
TONY TOOMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIGHT v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00385
Petitioner:
TONY BRIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUNSFORD v. TIPTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.
as 1:2017cv02330
Defendant:
SAMUEL ABBOTT, LORA BYRD, MATTHEW DECKARD and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA LUNSFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
