Cases 51 - 60 of 996
DODD v. FORMER et al
as 1:2023cv01730
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DODD
Defendant:
JENNIFER FORMER, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, WESTVILLE CORR FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT SLOAN
Defendant:
SHERIFF DWAYNE BURGESS, MAJOR REINHART, LT. C. KAKAVECOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. REGAL
as 1:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
HOLLIS WILLIAMS, IV
Defendant:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEALER et al v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MEALER, MARCUS ARMSTEAD, DANIEL REYHER and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREG LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CHARLES LEAUNDRE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILZEN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant:
DENIS REAGLE, WILLIAMS, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUGH v. PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT et al
as 2:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BAUGH
Defendant:
PARKE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT, JUSTIN COLE, ED ROACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREDERICK v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
SHANNON FREDERICK
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, ATKINS and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILZEN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant:
DENIS REAGLE, WILLIAMS and A. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
