Cases 1 - 10 of 449
SAGE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUIS SAGE
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, STROSNIDER, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEAD v. DECKARD et al
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Dean Arthur Mead
Defendant:
B. Deckard Officer, BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Monroe County Sheriff Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNING v. RIGGS et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JAMES DENNING
Defendant:
B. RIGGS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
A. HARMON, GRAY, B. LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, B. LALOUX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICH v. REAGAN et al
as 2:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. RICH
Defendant:
REAGAN, FIELDS and SHEILA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZELENKA v. JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv01885
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ZELENKA
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MELINDA FIELDS, MICHELLE SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORREST v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
JASON B. FORREST
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
