Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
FULLER v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00154
Petitioner: KENLEY PEIEAIR FULLER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FULLER v. WARDEN
as 2:2020cv00525
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: ROLAND EUGENE FULLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FULLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02250
Petitioner: BRANDON FULLER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff: WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant: BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLER v. USA
as 1:2016cv01550
Petitioner: CHARLES E. FULLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FULLER v. USA
as 1:2016cv01559
Petitioner: ARMAND RAY FULLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FULLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00727
Petitioner: LEON FULLER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FULLER BEY JR. v. ZATECKY
as 1:2016cv00712
Petitioner: DANA C. FULLER BEY
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FULLER v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00181
Petitioner: RICARDO B. FULLER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FULLER BEY JR. v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00277
Petitioner: DANA C FULLER BEY JR.
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?