Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNHART et al v. BRANHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
STAN BARNHART and DONNA BARNHART
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, GREG DAY, TONY SEIDL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRINGFIELD v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE SPRINGFIELD
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, BYRD, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. WIDENER et al
as 1:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
EUGENE E. WELLS, JR.
Defendant:
BRANDY WIDENER, PENNY EDEN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 1-8 v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1-8
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DAVID LOWE, Unknown Jail Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. SEVIER et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH BROOKS
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, J. LEE, S. SAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STURGIS v. GUST et al
as 1:2021cv02877
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L. STURGIS
Defendant:
JUSTIN M. GUST, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2020cv00265
Defendant:
RITA ETIENNE, MICHELLE ELMER, BEVERLY GRAVES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
