Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MOSLEY v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00876
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MOSLEY
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSLEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. REAVES et al
as 1:2021cv02058
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Respondent:
ANGELA REAVES and RYAN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSLEY v. SEVIER
as 1:2021cv01980
Petitioner:
JOHN A. MOSLEY
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 4:2021cv00011
Defendant:
BOB CURL, JEFF CUMBERWORTH, RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01343
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
COREY S. MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv00255
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JOHNSON, BRIAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
JEREL MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOSLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2014cv00003
Petitioner:
COREY LAMONT MOSLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
