Cases 1 - 10 of 26
BUTLER v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, BILL, GRANDSTAFF and others
Plaintiff:
IMARIA BUTLER and IMARI BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv01949
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, BILL, PULLY and others
Plaintiff:
IMARIA BUTLER and IMARI BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOOD v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. FLOOD
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, JOSHUA SNOW, LORNA HARBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. KIRBY et al
as 2:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
KIRBY, HENSLEY and WILLIAM HYATTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLATER v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
STEVE SLATER
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/MCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER G. LEWIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, MARY LASSITER, JACQUELINE SCAIFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENNINGER v. HYATT
as 1:2022cv00414
Petitioner:
JASON D. PENNINGER
Respondent:
WILLIAM HYATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLE v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2021cv02855
Plaintiff:
ANTHON L. COLE and ANTHONY L. COLE
Defendant:
COCHRAN, WILLIAM HYATT and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
