Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
MATHIS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01893
Plaintiff: CHAD E. MATHIS
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., LEE D. MOORE and SOURCE BROKERAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
MATHIS v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03755
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax: John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff: BONNIE MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02498
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MATHIS v. ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2016cv01537
Defendant: ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: SHERRY MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
INDIANA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, INC. v. TOWN OF MOORESVILLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01493
Defendant: JEFFREY M. COOK, ANTHONY LANGLEY, MARK MATHIS and others
Plaintiff: INDIANA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BEANS v. CITY OF ROMULUS et al
as 1:2011cv00203
Plaintiff: DAVID SHERMAN BEANS
Defendant: CITY OF ROMULUS, PAM MATHY and MAGISTRATE DAVID PEEBLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01170
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?