Cases 11 - 20 of 71,249
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
DAMON JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant:
PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHISLER et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHISLER and AMBER WHISLER
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MURAWSKI v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. MURAWSKI
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
TIBBETTS v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
HILLARY TIBBETTS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WOOLSEY v. LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kian Woolsey
Defendant:
LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
TRISHA A. LEBLANC v. SINGH et al
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
TRISHA A LEBLANC
Defendant:
SIKANDER SINGH and GILLSON TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ANDREW HAMM v. ERIC R. DUVENDACK et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HAMM
Defendant:
ERIC R. DUVENDACK and VENTURE EXPRESS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
HELEN JOHNSON and KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
