Cases 21 - 28 of 28
CARLISLE v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01949
Plaintiff:
ROLAND M. CARLISLE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ANKH EL et al v. HILL et al
as 1:2013cv01471
Defendant:
M. ADDINGTON, ROBERT R. ALTICE, AMY BARBAR and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL and TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR-BEY v. CARLISLE et al
as 1:2013cv01075
Defendant:
SHEILA A. CARLISLE, TERRY CURRY, LINDSAY GEDIG and others
Plaintiff:
TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. CARLISLE et al
as 2:2012cv00074
Defendant:
SHEILA A. CARLISLE, Mr. HARSTOCK, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlisle v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00490
Plaintiff:
LINDA CARLISLE
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, INC., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VALDEZ v. MONTANA SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2009cv01323
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO VALDEZ
Respondent:
MONTANA SUPREME COURT, JON KEVIN REID, KIMBERLY J. DEL GRECO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUSSELMAN et al v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01052
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARVINMERITOR, INC., ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FIRST DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK and THE CARLISLE APARTMENTS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
