Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 275
ALLEN v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00125
Petitioner: DWAYNE K. ALLEN
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOUGLAS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00124
Petitioner: BIATHA DOUGLAS
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00119
Petitioner: ALFRED L. DAVIS
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KONSOER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00118
Petitioner: 105532 ANTHONY R. KONSOER
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HESTER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00116
Petitioner: CHAD T. HESTER
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00093
Petitioner: JEROLE W. ADAMS
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAINTIGNON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00266
Plaintiff: DANNY L. SAINTIGNON, JR.
Defendant: VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, M. ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00087
Defendant: DANNY MITCHELL
Petitioner: TYRONE FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff: CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
HOLLANDSWORTH v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00065
Petitioner: JEREMY HOLLANDSWORTH
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?