Cases 31 - 40 of 159
SULLIVAN et al v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
THA DEPUTY WARDEN #2, J. E. KRUEGER, SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLE, JR. v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02595
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEON COLE, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ARCHULETTA et al v. MER CORPORATION
as 1:2020cv02264
Plaintiff:
ALANA CAMPOS SOUZA, JOANNA KRUPA, JENNIFER ARCHULETTA and others
Defendant:
MER CORPORATION D/B/A DANCERS SHOWCLUB and MER CORPORATION doing business as DANCERS SHOWCLUB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PAYNE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00945
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LUTHER v. RUST et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Defendant:
B. RUST, B. GAYTAN and J. MATLOCK
Plaintiff:
JESSE A. LUTHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHMOND v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00039
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, WALTON, JESSE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINNETT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04416
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JESSE RAY STINNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04267
Plaintiff:
JESSE C. TAYLOR and BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF JESSE C. TAYLOR
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and COOK INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al.
as 1:2019cv03255
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE COOPER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00156
Defendant:
JAMES COOMER, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
