Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2010cv00171
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: JOSHUA MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. HANKS
as 1:2010cv00668
Respondent: CRAIG A. HANKS
Petitioner: MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant: JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHILDS v. WRIGLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00981
Plaintiff: ROBERT DALE CHILDS
Defendant: JEFFREY WRIGLEY, CRAIG HANKS, TRINA RANDALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2008cv00338
Petitioner: JOSHUA MOODY
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GERALD et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00706
Plaintiff: DONZELL GERALD
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, J. DAVID DONAHUE, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FERGUSON et al v. HANKS et al
as 1:2008cv00140
Plaintiff: HARRY E. FERGUSON, ALVERTON LERCH, MICHAEL HART and others
Defendant: CRAIG HANKS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. HANKS
as 2:2008cv00026
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER DALE MYERS
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DISHMAN v. HANKS
as 1:2008cv00092
Petitioner: TODD M. DISHMAN
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON v. HANKS
as 1:2007cv01292
Petitioner: HARRY HARRISON
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?