Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01512
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SALISBURY v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00987
Defendant: KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, BOTTLING GROUP, LLC and PEPSICO, INC.
Plaintiff: CHARLENE SALISBURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GALAN v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, I
as 1:2020cv00524
Plaintiff: TONYA GALAN
Defendant: KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARTZ et al v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00069
Plaintiff: JOSEPHINE SCHWARTZ, JEFFREY SCHWARTZ, CARI SCHWARTZ and others
Defendant: KROGER PRESCRIPTION PLANS, INC, EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC, KROGER SPECIALTY PHARMACY, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
JOYCE et al v. TOPVALCO, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04901
Plaintiff: JOANNE JOYCE and TIMOTHY JOYCE
Defendant: KRGP, INC., PRIORITY PROPERTIES, LLC, TOPVALCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POINTER et al v. THE KROGER CO.
as 1:2019cv03651
Plaintiff: MIKE POINTER and CRYSTL POINTER
Defendant: THE KROGER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAULK v. THE KROGER CO. et al
as 1:2019cv03640
Defendant: KRGP Inc., THE KROGER CO., KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I and others
Plaintiff: RYAN FAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUDESQUE v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I et al
as 1:2019cv02821
Defendant: KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff: ELMA TUDESQUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURT v. KROGER CO.
as 1:2019cv01957
Plaintiff: TAMMY HURT
Defendant: KROGER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?