Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
PETERSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01093
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
TAMARA J PETERSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 1:2013cv01587
Defendant:
BRIELLE COTTERMAN SCHWARTZ, AMERICANTRUST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, DICKSIE BLANKENSHIP and others
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
STEELE et al v. WAL-MART et al
as 1:2013cv01490
Defendant:
APA, LESLEY BEST, CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ARABIA STEELE, TAJAINA D. STEELE and TAMARA L. STEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
CRISWELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00623
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
TAMARA L. CRISWELL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PADGETT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00820
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TAMARA S. PADGETT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
