Cases 51 - 60 of 133
MANUEL v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv03299
Plaintiff:
DARRELL L. MANUEL, SR.
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT E. CARTER and DUANE ALSIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. ARAMARK CORPORATION FOOD SERVICES PROVIDER et al
as 1:2019cv02374
Defendant:
MICHAEL CONYERS, ARAMARK CORPORATION FOOD SERVICES PROVIDER, DUANE ALSIP and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv02346
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, AGNES A. OPOKU, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWIFT v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2019cv02354
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS and JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv02180
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DAVID MASON and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv02164
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DAVID MASON and others
Plaintiff:
BRIEN CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01956
Plaintiff:
CECIL DUANE MATHIS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEAVER v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv01950
Plaintiff:
DONALD E. WEAVER, JR.
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., PAUL TALBOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHEED v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv01867
Defendant:
GREGORY HUBBARD, DUSHAN ZATECKY and DUANE ALSIP
Plaintiff:
SAJJAD RASHEED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYKINS v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2019cv01135
Defendant:
CHRISTINA COOKE and DUANE ALSIP
Plaintiff:
DE'ADRIAN C. BOYKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
