Cases 51 - 60 of 1,737
MARCUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY S. MARCUM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv01160
Plaintiff:
DONALD TROY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
KIMBERLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01162
Petitioner:
BRETT C. KIMBERLIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
FICZNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01139
Petitioner:
ROBERT FICZNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
GILREATH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
SHAWN S. GILREATH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
CHANCELLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00307
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY CHANCELLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MUKHERJEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
MUKUNDA MUKHERJEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
RITCHIE v. IU HEALTH PHYSICIANS
as 1:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
BRANDI RITCHIE
Defendant:
IU HEALTH PHYSICIANS, ANONYMOUS HOSPITAL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
WADE L. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
