Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 61 - 70 of 129
MARK ALAN LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00001
Petitioner: MARK ALAN LANE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00007
Petitioner: MICHAEL V. LANE
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. SPAINHOUR
as 1:2013cv01980
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant: MARVIN SPAINHOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COX et al v. CA HOLDING INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01754
Plaintiff: ROBERT BROWN, LUCINDA COX, DEVIN HARLEY and others
Defendant: CA HOLDING INC., CACH LLC, CACH OF NJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LANE v. USA
as 3:2013cv00184
Petitioner: MARK A. LANE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. CABEZAS
as 1:2013cv01430
Defendant: MARTA M. CABEZAS
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. DOGGENDORF
as 1:2013cv01431
Defendant: DOGGENDORF
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT et al
as 1:2013cv01410
Plaintiff: LISA LANE
Defendant: TRAVELERS INSURANCE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Type: Contract Insurance
LANE v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2013cv01395
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant: LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. DOGGENDORF
as 1:2013cv01379
Defendant: DOGGENDORF
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?