Cases 71 - 80 of 353
ROSE v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROSE
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALSIP, STAMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. SEVIER et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH BROOKS
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, J. LEE, S. SAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADUS v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2021cv03025
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS L. BROADUS
Defendant:
DELANA GARDNER, BECKIE BENNET, NUSEING STAFF JANE OR JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS et al v. USA DIVING, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03015
Defendant:
JOHN WINGFIELD, INDIANA DIVING ACADEMY, INC., JOHEL RAMIREZ SUAREZ and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1, AMY STEVENS and JANE DOES 3-50
Interested Party:
U.S. CENTER FOR SAFESPORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STURGIS v. GUST et al
as 1:2021cv02877
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L. STURGIS
Defendant:
JUSTIN M. GUST, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE I v. CERTIPHI SCREENING, INC.
as 1:2021cv02620
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE I, as Legal Guardian of the Person and Estate of JANE DOE II, an Incapacitated Adult and JANE DOE I
Defendant:
CERTIPHI SCREENING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNES v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARNES
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, OGLESBY, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLDER ALI et al v. CREAMER
as 2:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. HOLDER ALI
Defendant:
T, CREAMER, JOHN DOE, JOHN/JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN AUSDALL & FARRAR, INC. v. DOE
as 1:2021cv01861
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
VAN AUSDALL & FARRAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRITT v. WEXFORD et al
as 1:2021cv01889
Defendant:
DAVIS, DELK, COURTNY and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. PRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
