Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RODRIGUEZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04843
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BERTHA RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRENCH et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03179
Plaintiff:
BERTHA FRENCH and CHARLOTTE DAVIDSON
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and COOK INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURPIN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv02663
Plaintiff:
BERTHA MURRAY TURPIN
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LINDEMAN et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 4:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
BANTI BAKER, PAULA BECK, DEA DEES and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUTCHINSON v. WIGGINGTON
as 4:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
BERTHA HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
NEW ALBANY-FLOYD COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION and SPARK WIGGINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MINIARD v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00187
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and NORTHLAND GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
BERTHA MINIARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GRAY v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C.
as 1:2008cv01215
Plaintiff:
BERTHA GRAY and BERTHA GRAY
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MURRAY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2008cv00756
Plaintiff:
BERTHA E. MURRAY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURTON et al v. LACY et al
as 1:2007cv00918
Plaintiff:
BERTHA BURTON, BERTHA BURTON, EDGAR BURTON and others
Defendant:
LARRY R. LACY, SHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and SHELBY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
