Cases 1 - 10 of 38
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
LISA J. SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ELLIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FALICE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. FALICE
Defendant:
J. SMITH, J. STARRICK, J. YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
AARON J. SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER JR., JAMES BASINGER, W. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUDEK v. REPUBLIC-FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
ANN M. HUDEK
Defendant:
REPUBLIC-FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTH EAST TRAILER SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
MARSHALL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVIER, K. GRINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROPER v. TRIMBLE et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
TALON L. ROPER
Defendant:
B. TRIMBLE, S. DECKER, T. LITTLEJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDING v. KRISS et al
as 2:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HARDING
Defendant:
KRISS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv01930
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, BRAMBACH and BOLDMAN
Plaintiff:
AARON J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
