Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HENSLEY v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
JOSH HENSLEY, SHAINA LAUGHLIN, CHARLEY CATT and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JENKINS v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
WESLEE MYKLE ROSS JENKINS
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, DERRIK MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
SHANTA EBONY SHAREE HENDERSON
Defendant:
JAMIE LAUGHLIN and JULIE STOUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMB v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LAMB
Defendant:
TAMMY DAVIS, JOEY LAUGHLIN, LENORD BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DAVID LAUGHLIN and LEONARD BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, LEONARD BAKER, ZACK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. LAUGHLIN
as 1:2021cv00730
Respondent:
DAVID LAUGHLIN
Petitioner:
DEREK DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DURHAM v. LAUGHLIN
as 1:2021cv00415
Respondent:
DAVID LAUGHLIN
Petitioner:
DEREK DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DURHAM v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2021cv00407
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
TYLER JARBOE and DAVID JOSEPH LAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2020cv02747
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, ZACK JONES, JAKE LUNSFORD and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GODDIS and DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
