Cases 1 - 10 of 1,314
Ingersoll v. Linebarger et al
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ingersoll
Defendant:
Norman Linebarger, Jennifer Rumsey, Mark A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
THOMAS JR v. SCU
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER THOMAS JR
Defendant:
SCU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VOSS et al v. SMASH FRANCHISE PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
REBECCA VOSS and THOMAS VOSS
Defendant:
SMASH FRANCHISE PARTNERS, LLC and JUSTIN HASKIN
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
THOMAS v. JOHN et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN, NIKKI and LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VETCHECK LLC D/B/A VETCHECK PET URGENT CARE CENTER v. HARTLEY-THOMAS GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
VETCHECK LLC D/B/A VETCHECK PET URGENT CARE CENTER
Defendant:
HARTLEY-THOMAS GROUP, LLC, SABRENA HARTLEY and CHRISTINE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
ROEHRMAN et al v. MALWAREBYTES INC.
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROEHRMAN and Annamarie Stapinski
Defendant:
Malwarebytes Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MILLER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
AGUILAR et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
MONA E. AGUILAR and THOMAS AGUILAR
Defendant:
LESA TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THOMAS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
TONYA M THOMAS and TONYA M. THOMAS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
