Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HENDRY v. WAL-MART, INC.
as 1:2023cv01873
Plaintiff:
PAMELA HENDRY
Defendant:
WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MALOTT v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2022cv01777
Plaintiff:
MAXIE MALOTT
Defendant:
WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
CORNES v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL CORNES
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. and WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
NELIS v. SAM'S EAST INC D/B/A et al
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
ROBIN NELIS
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC D/B/A doing business as SAM'S CLUB NO. 6325 and WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SCARBROUGH v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02595
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA SCARBROUGH
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. d/b/a SAM'S CLUB, WAL-MART, INC. and SAM'S EAST, INC. doing business as SAM'S CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WYSOCKI v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02314
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE WYSOCKI
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. d/b/a Sam's Club, WAL-MART, INC. and SAM'S EAST, INC. doing business as SAM'S CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCPHERSON v. WAL-MART, INC.
as 4:2019cv00179
Plaintiff:
WAL-MART, INC. and BONITA MCPHERSON
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01647
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ALLERGAN PLC and others
Plaintiff:
THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
ROBB et al v. WAL-MART, INC.
as 1:2010cv01011
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROBB and SONIA ROBB
Defendant:
WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
