Cases 51 - 60 of 7,528
Watson v. Woodford County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Woodford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rice v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rice, II, Peewee and Dayton Ray Rice, II
Defendant:
Jaime Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Ward
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
John Raymond Ast
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cerimovic v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Zinaid Najo Cerimovic
Respondent:
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
