Cases 101 - 110 of 1,404
Couch v. Clay County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County, Kentucky, Linda Smallwood and Christine Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Taylor et al
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
Barry Taylor, James Ashley, Jorge Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Southeast State Correctional Complex
as 7:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Starks
Defendant:
Southeast State Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worley v. Broyles et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
David Worley
Defendant:
Derran C Broyles, Carla Cannon, Sarah Sons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. FCI Manchester
as 6:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sherrod L. Harris
Defendant:
FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simpson v. Day et al
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Emmanuel Simpson
Defendant:
Connie Day, Dan Brown, Craig Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Bourbon County et al
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Bourbon County, Sheriff Tony Asbury, Jailer West Burberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
