Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Breathitt County Board of Education et al
as 5:2012cv00371
Plaintiff:
Steve Banks
Defendant:
Breathitt County Board of Education , Melanie Stevens , George Daniel Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Napier v. Breathitt County Board of Education et al
as 5:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Charles David Napier
Defendant:
Breathitt County Board of Education , Melanie Stevens , George Daniel Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Pennco, Inc.
as 0:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Bernice Daniel
Defendant:
Pennco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Young et al v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Leslie M. Young and Gerald Young
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, LaDonna H. Thompson, Jim Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huston v. Boone County et al
as 2:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Huston
Defendant:
Boone County , Boone County, Kentucky Jailer , Rebecca Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunaway v. Campbell County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Christina Dunaway
Defendant:
Campbell County, Kentucky, Campbell County Fiscal Court, Greg Buckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Essek v. Vanderbilt Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00333
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Essek
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage, Inc., Clayton Homes, Inc., Howard O. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Zuercher et al
as 7:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Timothy U. Bell
Defendant:
M. Zuercher, P. Heffington, C. Linaweaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
