Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Nutini v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Michele Renee Nutini
Defendant:
City of Covington, C. Bell, Brian Valenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Bell
as 6:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny T Bell and Danny T. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Shehan v. The Honorable David L. Bunning et al
as 2:2020cv00012
Defendant:
Tom Howard, Director, I.R. S. Agent, Susan Palmisano, Craig Mosely, Director and others
Plaintiff:
William C. Shehan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West et al v. Kentucky Horse Racing Commission
as 5:2019cv00211
Defendant:
Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, Franklin S. Kling, Jr., Bret Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Gary West and Mary West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossmann v. Trump et al
as 5:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson, Reuben Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wieck et al v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Randy Wieck , Betsy Bell , Jane Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
