Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Pollard v. Travis et al
as 5:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Judge Thomas Travis, D.P.A. Valiery Church and Probation Officer Tim Clark
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Pollard, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Warick v. Tussey et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick and Gary D. Warick
Defendant:
George Tussey, Gerald Clark, Emmit Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Stull v. Clark County
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Johnny Stull
Defendant:
Clark County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
S.D. v. Eastern State Hospital et al
as 5:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
S.D.
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital, M.D. Clark Lester and APRN Jinny R. Woodcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Georgetown College et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
William A. Jones, Amy R. Jones, Annalise Jones and others
Defendant:
Georgetown College, Board of Trustees of Georgetown College, Rosemary A. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Schroll v. Wilson et al
as 6:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Shelly Schroll
Defendant:
Allen W. Wilson, Joseph G. Braden, Keith W. Young, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
