Cases 11 - 20 of 210
Taken Alive v. USA
as 6:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Taken Alive, Jr
Respondent:
USA and J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Gary Rose, E. A. Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taken Alive v. USA
as 6:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Taken Alive, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glover v. Ackers
as 6:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Roy E. Glover
Respondent:
Daniel Ackers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burke v. Quality Corrections Healthcare et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dave Burke
Defendant:
Quality Corrections Healthcare, C.E.O. Johnny E. Bates, Doctor Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Ms. Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. USA
as 0:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Paul E. Hart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bell v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marti E. Bell
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Melvin, Herley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
