Cases 41 - 50 of 445
Morel v. Pearce et al
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Kevin Pearce, James Adams, Nathan Tussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oiler v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
David Channing Oiler
Respondent:
Warden LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baugh v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Roger Kent Baugh
Respondent:
Warden LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Jones
Defendant:
Warden Gilley, J. Hutson, Larry Monhollen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coplen v. Warden of U.S.P. McCreary
as 6:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent:
Warden of U.S.P. McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mayhew v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
Michael J. Mayhew
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ewing et al
as 0:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Ewing
Respondent:
Warden D. Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frazer v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Joseph Young
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
