Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Turner, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Jailer James A. Daley, Lt. Hoyer, Maj. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 2:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Kenton County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Eric Berry, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mihalic v. Fayette Co. Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Mihalic, Sr.
Defendant:
Fayette Co. Detention Center, L. Farmer, Cpt. Morgansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elder v. Lincoln County Regional Jail
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jordan Levi Elder, Sr.
Defendant:
Lincoln County Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mihalic v. McDowell et al
as 5:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Mihalic, Sr.
Defendant:
Captain McDowell, Josh Lumbar, Captain Nick Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Crews et al
as 5:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. McIntosh, Sr.
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Larry Chandler, Dannel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
