Cases 151 - 160 of 30,943
Goff v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kamron Goff
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re Attorney Admission for Bradley M. Parke
as 7:2024aa00003
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
Keathley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 7:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Phyllistine Keathley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Rouse v. Murphy Oil, USA et al
as 6:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Rouse
Defendant:
Murphy Oil, USA, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ashcraft et al v. Dzeverdanovic et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tara Ashcraft and Aaron Ashcraft
Defendant:
Marko Dzeverdanovic and Excalibur Global Freight Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Dome v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dillon Dome
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Smith and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Marco Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
