Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yates et al v. Davis et al
as 0:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
James Yates and Will Smith
Defendant:
Kim Davis and Rowan County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Asia Adams , Lisa Amador , Kochshina Borden and others
Defendant:
Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC and Nathan Bunger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chau et al v. Ball et al
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Alan Ut Chau and Huong N. Chau
Defendant:
Kenton L. Ball , William W. James , Ann L. Kilcoyne and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Foster et al v. Rumpke Consolidated Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Amy Foster and Gabrielle Foster
Defendant:
Rumpke Consolidated Companies, Inc. , Rumpke Transportation Company, LLC , Rumpke of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yates v. SSA
as 7:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donna G. Yates
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Yates et al
as 5:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Phil Yates, Chris Hubbard, Sandy Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Yates et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 5:2008cv00217
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Plaintiff:
Robert Yates
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown et al v. Lewis County Primary Care Center, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dolores Brown, Delores Brown and Joanna Yates
Defendant:
Lewis County Primary Care Center, Inc. and Mark Fairchild
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
